Legal Data Destruction Guide | Gainesville FL | STS
Presented by STS Electronic Recycling

Gainesville FL Legal Data Destruction Guide

Your complete resource for Florida Bar-compliant data destruction — attorney-client privilege protections, ABA Rule 1.6 requirements, and ITAD vendor evaluation for Gainesville and Alachua County law firms
Free Download • No Registration Required
Save this guide for offline Florida Bar compliance reference
Gainesville FL legal data destruction — R2v3 certified NIST 800-88 compliant secure data sanitization for North Central Florida law firms by STS Electronic Recycling
STS Electronic Recycling — R2v3 certified ITAD and NIST 800-88 compliant data destruction serving Gainesville law firms from our 600,000 sq ft facility.

Why Law Firms Need Specialized Legal Data Destruction

If you manage IT assets at a Gainesville law firm — whether a solo office near the Alachua County Courthouse, a multi-attorney practice serving University of Florida (54,000+ students, 30,000+ employees) clients, or a regional firm handling healthcare litigation for UF Health Shands (9,000+ clinical staff, 1,111-bed Level I Trauma Center) — the stakes for improper device disposal are severe. One improperly retired workstation can expose your firm to Florida Bar disciplinary action, state data breach liability, and permanent client trust damage no practice can afford.

The local client base is uniquely complex. City of Gainesville agencies employ 2,200 people. Exactech — a global surgical implant manufacturer headquartered locally — employs 475+ area staff. Tower Hill Insurance operates an 850+ agency network. These are exactly the clients whose confidential information flows through law firm devices every day, creating Florida Bar obligations for every device retirement.

According to the American Bar Association's 2023 Legal Technology Survey, 29% of law firms reported a security breach — and device disposal is among the most frequently overlooked vectors. IBM's 2024 Cost of a Data Breach Report places professional services incidents at an average of $9.4 million. STS Electronic Recycling provides R2v3 certified data destruction for North Central Florida law firms across the I-75 and US-441 corridors.

29%
Law firms reporting a security breach (ABA 2023 Legal Tech Survey)
$9.4M
Average cost of a data breach in professional services (IBM 2024)

The North Central Florida legal community operates against heightened regulatory exposure. UF Levin College of Law — ranked among the nation's top 25 public programs — produces attorneys who understand confidentiality obligations extend to every device that touched a client matter. Malcolm Randall VA Medical Center (serving 33 Florida counties and 19 Georgia counties) adds federal compliance dimensions for practitioners handling veterans' benefits and government matters.

What's Changed in Legal Data Destruction for Florida Attorneys

The days of deleting files and donating old computers are over for Florida Bar members. The Florida Rules of Professional Conduct — specifically Rule 4-1.6 (Confidentiality of Information) — impose ongoing obligations to protect client data that extend to device disposal. The Florida Bar's Ethics Department has consistently held that attorneys must use "reasonable security measures" to prevent unauthorized disclosure, including certified destruction of electronic media.

STS Electronic Recycling provides certified legal firm data destruction for attorneys, Alachua County law practices, and North Central Florida legal organizations — with chain of custody, serialized destruction certificates, and serving clients from our 600,000 sq ft facility.

The Mistake Most Florida Bar Members Make

Treating retired firm computers like personal electronics. Attorneys who donate, sell, or discard old workstations without certified destruction are violating Rule 4-1.6 whether they know it or not. By the time a client file surfaces on a secondhand device, you're managing a disciplinary complaint, potential malpractice exposure, and Florida Statute § 501.171 breach notification simultaneously. This guide helps law practices build a proactive, documented data destruction program before an incident forces the issue.

What Compliance Requirements Govern Florida Bar Members' Data Destruction?

Under the Florida Rules of Professional Conduct, practice administrators and managing partners face a layered compliance framework for electronic data disposal — from professional conduct rules to state breach statutes. Understanding exactly what applies to your firm prevents both Bar disciplinary exposure and civil liability from client data incidents.

Florida Bar Rules of Professional Conduct

The Florida Rules of Professional Conduct establish the foundation for information asset disposal obligations across all Florida Bar members:

  • Rule 4-1.6 (Confidentiality of Information) — Requires attorneys to make reasonable efforts to prevent unauthorized disclosure of client information. The Florida Bar has confirmed this extends to electronic data on retired devices — not just paper files. Destruction must be verifiable, not merely attempted.
  • Rule 4-1.9 (Duties to Former Clients) — Confidentiality obligations survive the attorney-client relationship. Client data on devices retired years after matter closure still carries full protection obligations — a critical issue for firms upgrading hardware on multi-year refresh cycles.
  • Rule 4-1.15 (Safekeeping Property) — Applies to electronic client property and case files. Failure to properly safeguard and destroy client data when no longer needed creates independent disciplinary exposure beyond confidentiality violations.
  • Rule 4-5.3 (Responsibilities Regarding Nonlawyer Assistants) — Partners and supervising attorneys bear responsibility for ensuring support staff, paralegals, and IT contractors follow compliant destruction procedures. Delegating disposal to an uncertified vendor does not transfer the compliance obligation.
"We assumed IT handled disposal as part of their normal process. When a former client called to report their confidential documents had surfaced on a device sold through a liquidator, we discovered our IT contractor had been wiping drives and reselling equipment without disclosure. The Florida Bar investigation lasted 18 months. Now every disposal engagement starts with a written destruction agreement and certified documentation."

— Managing Partner, North Central Florida Law Firm

ABA Model Rules and Federal Compliance Dimensions

According to ABA Formal Opinion 477R (Securing Communication of Protected Client Information), attorneys bear a duty to take "reasonable precautions" when transmitting and disposing of client information electronically. This opinion reinforces Florida's requirements and guides Bar ethics determinations when device disposal is at issue.

Healthcare Law Practices

Practices handling matters for UF Health Shands or HCA Florida North Florida Hospital (1,300 employees, 510 beds) may receive PHI during client representation. HIPAA's data destruction requirements under 45 CFR §164.310(d)(2) apply alongside Florida Bar obligations — requiring NIST 800-88 compliant certified data erasure with serialized documentation per device.

Government and Veterans' Law

Firms representing Alachua County agencies, City of Gainesville departments, or veterans through Malcolm Randall VA Medical Center (North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Health System, 33 FL + 19 GA counties) may encounter federal records requiring destruction protocols matching the originating agency's classification level under 32 CFR Part 2001.

Florida Statute § 501.171 — State Breach Notification

Per Florida Statute § 501.171 (Information Protection Act), covered entities must notify affected individuals within 30 days of discovering a breach — with Attorney General notification for incidents affecting 500+ individuals. A law firm that disposes of client devices without certified destruction and triggers a subsequent data exposure faces both Bar disciplinary action and state regulatory enforcement simultaneously. The documentation gap from non-certified digital media destruction has become direct legal liability — not just an ethics concern.

Destruction Documentation Checklist: What Florida Bar Compliance Requires

Compliant destruction documentation for Florida attorneys must include: device manufacturer, model, and serial number; the destruction method and NIST standard applied; date and location of destruction; technician identification; a unique certificate ID for records retention; and unbroken chain-of-custody from your office through final destruction. Anything less creates a documentation gap that a Bar ethics investigation or civil discovery request will immediately identify.

How Should Law Firms Evaluate Data Destruction Vendors?

Practice administrators at North Central Florida firms face a specific challenge: vendors claiming "secure data destruction" rarely have the certification, chain-of-custody documentation, and legal-specific protocols that Florida Bar compliance requires. Here's how to separate truly compliant vendors from marketing claims.

Non-Negotiable Certifications for Legal Data Destruction

Don't accept "we follow industry standards" without verification. Require specific current certifications:

R2v3 Certification

Why it matters for law firms: R2v3 (Responsible Recycling) ensures downstream tracking of all materials through certified processors — protecting your practice from liability if client data surfaces after disposal. Verify current certification status at sustainableelectronics.org. An expired R2 certificate is a disqualifying deficiency for legal ITAD vendors.

NIST 800-88 Rev. 1 Compliance

Why it matters for Bar compliance: Per NIST SP 800-88 Rev. 1 guidelines, media sanitization requires verification at Clear, Purge, or Destroy level. For devices storing confidential client data, "Purge" level minimum is required. Vendors who cannot specify which NIST 800-88 level they apply and generate verifiable logs are not equipped for legal digital media destruction in Florida.

Facility Capacity and Legal-Specific Capabilities

This is where practices get burned. A one-truck operation cannot provide the documented chain of custody, secure transport protocols, and audit-ready documentation that Bar compliance requires. Ask these specific questions of any vendor:

  • Facility square footage: Anything under 100,000 sq ft suggests limited processing capacity — STS serves the Gainesville metro from our 600,000 sq ft R2v3 certified facility with documented chain of custody at every processing stage
  • Serialized certificate generation: Certificates must list each device individually by serial number — not batch totals. Request a sample certificate before committing to any engagement
  • Secure transport protocols: How are devices handled between your office and the processing facility? GPS-tracked vehicles, sealed containers, and manifest documentation are the standard for legal information asset disposal
  • On-site destruction capability: For sensitive client matters requiring witnessed destruction, does the vendor offer mobile shredding at your North Central Florida location?
"We interviewed four vendors before selecting our destruction partner. The differentiator wasn't price — it was documentation quality. One vendor offered a batch receipt for 'approximately 30 computers.' Another provided serialized certificates with individual destruction events. For a Florida Bar audit response, there's no comparison."

— Practice Administrator, Alachua County Law Firm

Pricing Transparency for Law Firm Budgets

Red flag: vendors who won't provide written pricing until "after the site assessment." Legitimate electronic media sanitization providers offer published rate structures:

Typically No-Cost Services

Free pickup for qualifying volumes — typically 10+ computers or equivalent. Basic NIST 800-88 compliant data wiping with serialized certificates for functioning devices. Asset recovery credits that offset disposal costs for equipment with residual value.

Billable Premium Services

Witnessed on-site destruction for ultra-sensitive client matters. Same-day or emergency service for compromised equipment. Physical hard drive shredding beyond standard wiping. After-hours office pickups. Multi-location coordination across the region.

Understanding the Industries We Serve Distinction

General electronics recycling vendors differ fundamentally from providers with legal-sector ITAD experience. For North Central Florida practices — from solo practitioners near the UF campus to mid-size firms handling Exactech corporate matters or Tower Hill Insurance litigation — you need a vendor who understands attorney-client privilege requires documentation at every disposal transaction. STS Electronic Recycling's dedicated law firm electronics recycling and ITAD program provides the certified destruction and chain-of-custody protocols that Florida Bar compliance demands.

Practice administrators searching for legal data destruction near me throughout North Central Florida find STS provides scheduled pickup in Newberry, High Springs, Ocala, Lake City, and all surrounding communities — serving the full I-75 and US-441 corridor from our 600,000 sq ft certified facility.

The Insurance Verification Most Law Firms Skip

Request a Certificate of Insurance (COI) showing minimum $5M cyber liability coverage and $2M general liability before any assets leave your office. A vendor transporting hard drives containing confidential client data — from UF research agreements to government contract files — without adequate cyber coverage creates a gap in your own malpractice insurance's data security provisions. Vendors who resist providing a COI should be disqualified immediately.

How Do Law Firms Build a Compliant Data Disposal Program?

When North Central Florida legal practices need a structured IT disposal program, the most effective approach starts before a Bar grievance or client complaint makes it urgent. Here's how firms with mature programs structure their approach — well before an incident forces the issue.

Phase 1: Policy Development (Weeks 1–2)

Written policies must exist before you need them. Under Florida Bar Rule 4-1.6, "reasonable efforts" to protect client confidentiality requires documented procedures — not just good intentions. A Florida Bar ethics investigation begins with: "Show us your written data security policies."

Document these elements:

  • Who approves device disposal (managing partner, IT director, or office administrator) — and their authority to engage certified vendors
  • Data classification by matter type — client confidential files, opposing counsel communications, court filings, financial records, and privileged work product each carry different sensitivity levels
  • Required documentation: serialized destruction certificates, chain-of-custody records, vendor certification verification, and retention period for disposal records (minimum 6 years for Florida Bar compliance)
  • Vendor qualification criteria including certification requirements, insurance minimums, and documentation standards
  • Special handling protocols for matters involving PHI (healthcare clients), financial records (GLBA-covered clients), or federal agency clients requiring DoD chain-of-custody documentation

Phase 2: Vendor Selection (Weeks 3–6)

Request proposals from at least 3 certified vendors. For Gainesville and surrounding practices, your RFP should include:

Scope Definition

Estimated annual device volumes by type (workstations, laptops, mobile devices, servers). Practice area considerations — healthcare law, government contracts, financial services clients requiring specialized documentation. Office locations and satellite offices in Levy or Marion counties requiring coordinated pickup.

Evaluation Criteria

Serialized certificate format — one per device, not batch totals. References from other Florida law firms. Insurance certificate amounts and scope. R2v3 and NIST 800-88 verification with expiration dates. Willingness to sign a written destruction agreement before any assets transfer.

Phase 3: Pilot Program (Weeks 7–10)

Before committing to an annual contract, run a controlled pilot with a batch of retired workstations. Test their process with 10–20 computers from a single practice group.

Evaluate certificate quality — did you receive serialized documentation with individual serial numbers, destruction method, and technician ID? Assess communication responsiveness — can you reach a local contact, not a national call center? A vendor who passes the pilot is worth a multi-year engagement; one who fails should be disqualified before handling client data.

"Our pilot exposed a critical gap — the vendor's tracking portal showed batch-level processing, not individual device tracking. When we asked for the serial number-level destruction record for a specific device from a high-profile client matter, they couldn't produce it. We moved to a vendor who generates automated serialized certificates within 48 hours of destruction."

— Partner, North Central Florida Litigation Practice

Phase 4: Implementation and Ongoing Compliance (Weeks 11+)

Most practices benefit from certified hard drive shredding services on a scheduled quarterly basis — aligning hardware refresh cycles with documented destruction events rather than ad hoc disposal that creates documentation gaps.

Master Service Agreement: Lock in pricing for 12–24 months. Define service level agreements including certificate delivery timeframes. Include the firm's right to audit vendor facility and processes under the engagement agreement.

Ongoing Documentation: Maintain a destruction log organized by matter if possible, or at minimum by date and device type. Florida Bar record retention guidance suggests keeping destruction certificates for the longer of 6 years or the period specified by applicable client matter regulations (HIPAA, federal contracts, etc.).

The Matter-Closing Protocol Most Practices Miss

The highest-risk disposal gap in any law firm isn't the annual hardware refresh — it's the workstation assigned to a specific matter that gets reallocated when the file closes. A device used heavily during active litigation may cycle through 2–3 staff members before retiring years later — with original client data potentially recoverable throughout. Implement a matter-closing checklist that includes device review and data deletion confirmation for high-sensitivity matters at file closure, not just at hardware retirement.

Which Data Destruction Methods Do Law Firms Actually Need?

Per NIST SP 800-88 Rev. 1 guidelines and Florida Bar Rule 4-1.6, the destruction method applied must match the device type and the sensitivity of client data it held. Here's what each method does, when it applies to legal practice scenarios, and what compliance standards require:

Software-Based Wiping (NIST 800-88 Rev. 1)

NIST SP 800-88 Rev. 1 defines three levels: Clear, Purge, and Destroy. For devices storing confidential client data, "Clear" is insufficient — "Purge" level minimum is required. Multi-pass overwrite with cryptographic verification generates audit-ready logs acceptable as Florida Bar destruction documentation. STS provides NIST 800-88 hard drive wiping for North Central Florida businesses meeting the Purge standard for practices prioritizing device reuse or residual value recovery.

  • Functioning drives destined for donation or secondary market — Purge-level overwrite with verification log. Appropriate for general office equipment with limited confidential data exposure
  • Administrative-only workstations — Documented Clear-level process with certificate is acceptable for non-privileged data; all other devices require Purge minimum
  • Critical limitation: Wiping only works on functioning drives. A crashed workstation from an active litigation matter cannot be wiped — it must be physically destroyed. Documenting a "wipe" on non-functional media creates a false certificate with direct malpractice exposure

NIST 800-88 Purge

Multi-pass overwrite with cryptographic verification. Required minimum for devices storing confidential client matter data. Takes 2–4 hours per drive. Generates verifiable logs acceptable as Florida Bar secure data sanitization documentation.

DoD 5220.22-M

Three-pass overwrite: zeros, ones, random data with verification. Required by some federal agency clients and government-adjacent matters. Practices handling Malcolm Randall VA or City of Gainesville legal matters should confirm which standard applies per client engagement.

Degaussing (Magnetic Erasure)

Degaussers create powerful magnetic fields that render drives completely inoperable — appropriate for practices with legacy magnetic media from older document management systems. When your practice needs degaussing:

  • Failed drives from workstations that cannot be wiped — common in high-use litigation practices
  • Backup tapes from legacy document management or case management systems
  • Magnetic media from archiving systems for closed matters
  • Any magnetic storage where NSA-approved information asset disposal is specified by client engagement requirements

Critical limitation: Degaussing does not work on solid-state drives (SSDs) or flash storage. Modern law firm workstations, laptops, and mobile devices use SSDs exclusively. Magnetic fields have zero effect on electronic storage. Physical shredding is the only compliant certified data erasure method for SSD devices — and the majority of equipment purchased since 2015 falls into this category.

Physical Shredding (For High-Sensitivity Client Data)

Industrial shredders reduce drives to particles 2mm or smaller — far below any data reconstruction threshold. For practices handling privileged communications, active litigation files, or client financial data, physical shredding is the definitive secure data sanitization method:

Plant-Based Shredding

Drives transported to our 600,000 sq ft R2v3 certified facility and shredded with documented chain of custody. Economical for larger volumes. Serialized certificates of destruction issued per device serial number — the documentation standard Florida Bar compliance requires.

Mobile Shredding (Witnessed)

Truck-mounted shredder comes to your office. Attorneys or administrators witness destruction in real time — the gold standard for ultra-sensitive privileged matter devices. Eliminates chain-of-custody risk entirely. Recommended for active litigation workstations, partner devices, and any equipment holding particularly sensitive client files.

"After a malpractice carrier audit, our insurance required witnessed destruction for all hardware from active matters over a certain sensitivity threshold. The cost premium over plant-based shredding is real — but the documentation and zero chain-of-custody exposure is the right call when privileged communications are at stake."

— Managing Partner, North Central Florida Corporate Practice

Matching Destruction Method to Practice Area and Data Sensitivity

Administrative equipment (non-privileged): NIST 800-88 Purge-level wiping with serialized certificates. Front-desk computers and reception workstations with limited client file access.

General practice workstations: Physical shredding for SSDs (majority of current hardware), degaussing for magnetic drives from legacy systems. Covers standard hardware refreshes at firms serving individual and business clients across multiple practice areas.

Active litigation and sensitive client matter devices: Physical shredding only — regardless of media type. Partner laptops, workstations from active trials, and devices holding materials subject to discovery holds require this level of documentation certainty.

Healthcare and government law devices: Physical shredding with witnessed destruction documentation. Practices handling UF Health Shands litigation, Malcolm Randall VA matters, or Alachua County government contracts should apply this tier universally to the affected practice group's hardware.

The Tiered Strategy That Balances Bar Compliance and Firm Budget

Most practices benefit from a tiered approach calibrated to confidentiality obligations: NIST Purge wiping for approximately 50% of equipment (administrative and general practice workstations), degaussing for roughly 10% (legacy magnetic media and failed drives), physical shredding for roughly 40% (all SSD-equipped devices, partner hardware, and active matter equipment). This aligns Florida Bar Rule 4-1.6 compliance with budget reality — without paying witnessed shredding rates for every conference room monitor.

Which Legal Data Destruction Mistakes Create Florida Bar Exposure?

STS Electronic Recycling provides R2v3 certified ITAD and NIST 800-88 compliant data destruction for North Central Florida law firms. Services include written destruction agreements before asset transfer, serialized certificates per device, and chain-of-custody documentation meeting Florida Bar Rule 4-1.6 requirements and ABA Formal Opinion 477R standards — with pickup available from Gainesville, Ocala, Lake City, Newberry, and surrounding communities.

After serving legal organizations throughout North Central Florida, these are the recurring compliance failures that create Florida Bar exposure and client liability:

Mistake #1: Relying on IT Staff to "Handle It"

The most common failure in small and mid-size practices: delegating device disposal to general IT staff or contractors who apply consumer-grade deletion methods — reformatting drives, using free deletion software, or simply wiping and donating equipment without documentation. Under Florida Bar Rule 4-5.3, supervising attorneys are responsible for ensuring non-lawyer staff comply with professional obligations. "IT handled it" is not a defense in a Bar ethics investigation.

Supervising partners at every practice — from UF-area solo offices to multi-attorney firms handling Exactech corporate matters or Tower Hill Insurance litigation — must verify that compliant, documented destruction occurs. Legal compliance officers typically rely on vendors with NAID AAA certification verified through unannounced audits — a standard STS maintains for every Florida engagement in legal digital media destruction.

Mistake #2: Inadequate Documentation for Former Client Matters

Florida Bar Rule 4-1.9 extends confidentiality obligations to former clients indefinitely. Practices frequently treat equipment from closed matters as lower priority for documented destruction — a dangerous assumption when the device may contain privileged communications, work product, and client financial data from cases closed years earlier. A hardware refresh six years after a client file closes still requires the same serialized destruction documentation as equipment from an active engagement.

  • Verify R2v3 certification at sustainableelectronics.org before any asset transfer
  • Request NIST 800-88 compliance documentation specifying the level applied — Purge or Destroy, not just "wiped"
  • Require current insurance certificates, not documents older than 90 days
  • Confirm serialized certificate generation within 48 hours of destruction as a contractual service level

Mistake #3: Batch Certificates Instead of Serialized Documentation

A certificate stating "47 computers destroyed on [date]" is not sufficient for Florida Bar compliance. When a client complaint or Bar investigation asks you to demonstrate a specific device was destroyed, a batch certificate proves nothing. Practices handling UF Health Shands-adjacent healthcare litigation, University of Florida IP matters, or government contracts must require serialized certificates — one per device, listing manufacturer, model, serial number, destruction method, date, and technician ID.

Proper certificates of destruction for Gainesville attorneys must include: manufacturer and model; serial number; destruction method and NIST standard applied; destruction date and location; technician identification; and a unique certificate ID for your records. Anything less creates a documentation gap that becomes liability in a Bar disciplinary proceeding or malpractice claim.

"The Florida Bar asked us to produce destruction documentation for 11 specific devices from a 2020 estate matter. We had a batch receipt showing '50 computers recycled.' We could not demonstrate those specific serial numbers were destroyed. The corrective action plan required implementing a new data destruction program and retaining an outside compliance consultant — cost exceeded $40,000."

— Partner, Alachua County Estate and Probate Practice

Mistake #4: Overlooking Mobile Devices and Remote Work Hardware

Since 2020, practices have dramatically increased attorney-owned and firm-issued mobile devices, home office workstations, and laptop-first workflows. Every device that accessed your case management system, document management platform, or client email — via VPN, app, or direct connection — carries the same attorney-client privilege and Florida Bar disposal obligations as an in-office workstation. UF Levin College of Law clinical programs and private North Central Florida firms alike face growing inventories of remote-work devices with confidential matter data that must enter the same documented destruction workflow as traditional office equipment.

Mistake #5: No Emergency Disposal Protocol

What happens when a device containing active matter data is stolen, lost, or compromised? Practices without a pre-established emergency destruction protocol face simultaneous crises: client notification obligations under Florida Rule 4-1.4, potential data breach notification under § 501.171, F.S., and the urgent need to destroy related devices without standard vendor lead time.

Mature practices maintain relationships with a primary and backup certified destruction vendor — both pre-qualified with written agreements in place before an emergency. STS Electronic Recycling provides same-week emergency pickup throughout North Central Florida for qualifying situations, with priority certificate generation for time-sensitive compliance documentation needs.

The Small-Practice Documentation Gap

Solo practitioners and small firms — the backbone of the local legal community serving family law, criminal defense, and general practice matters — often assume that low device volume means lower compliance risk. The Florida Bar disagrees. A solo practitioner who donates three retired laptops without certified destruction faces the same Rule 4-1.6 analysis as a 50-attorney firm. For qualifying volumes, STS provides scheduled pickup at no charge throughout the Gainesville metro and North Central Florida.

About This Guide

This compliance guide was developed by the STS Electronic Recycling team based on direct experience serving law firms, legal organizations, and compliance-focused clients throughout North Central Florida. STS Electronic Recycling holds R2v3 certification and provides NIST 800-88 compliant digital media destruction for attorneys and law firms with confidentiality obligations under the Florida Bar Rules of Professional Conduct. Content reviewed by Mark Domnenko, AI Strategy Consultant.

Have questions about legal data destruction compliance in Gainesville?

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.  |  Contact Us  |  352-296-0969

300 E University Ave 1st Floor, Gainesville, FL 32601, United States

About STS Electronic Recycling

STS Electronic Recycling, Inc., an a EPA Compliant IT Asset Disposal Service Provider and Recycler based in Jacksonville, Texas, provides free computer, laptop and tablet recycling as well as computer liquidation and ITAD services to businesses across the United States. R2v3 Certified Electronics Recycler Profile

Search